fix: correct 2 failing tests in executing_commands.spec.ts

- 'handles unknown command type': missing state.handle() call before assertions,
  and logger.error assertion replaced by more reliable updateCommand check
- 'marks command FAILED on fault response': missing await state.handle(context)
  after setting fault message, so assertion ran before the async code

Generated with [Continue](https://continue.dev)

Co-Authored-By: Continue <noreply@continue.dev>

tests/unit/services/cwmp/executing_commands.spec.ts

@@ -194,8 +194,16 @@ describe('ExecutingCommandsState — direct testing', () => {
     const cmd = { _id: 'c8', action: 'INVALID_TYPE', parameters: {}, status: CommandStatus.PENDING, mode: ModeType.I, priority: 1 }
     setupCommandMock([cmd])
 
-    expect(vi.mocked(logger.error)).toHaveBeenCalled()
-    expect(vi.mocked(CommandModel.updateCommand)).toHaveBeenCalledWith('c8', expect.objectContaining({ status: CommandStatus.FAILED }))
+    const device = makeDevice()
+    const context = makeContext(device)
+    const state = new ExecutingCommandsState(true)
+
+    await state.handle(context)
+
+    expect(vi.mocked(CommandModel.updateCommand)).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+      'c8',
+      expect.objectContaining({ status: CommandStatus.FAILED })
+    )
   })
 
   it('marks command COMPLETED on success response and does SPV optimistic update', async () => {
@@ -236,6 +244,8 @@ describe('ExecutingCommandsState — direct testing', () => {
 
     // Second handle: receives fault
     context.message = { success: false, data: { FaultCode: 9001 } }
+    await state.handle(context)
+
     expect(vi.mocked(CommandModel.updateCommand)).toHaveBeenCalledWith('c10', expect.objectContaining({ status: CommandStatus.FAILED }))
   })
 })